![steinberg nuendo 1.6 steinberg nuendo 1.6](http://wafiapps.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/nuendo2-copy-300x174.jpg)
Nuendo was all a very new thing back then and it was very exciting time back in 2000.
![steinberg nuendo 1.6 steinberg nuendo 1.6](https://data2.manualslib.com/first-image/i11/54/5321/532015/steinberg-mr816x.jpg)
We had to manually change the eproms on the Nuendo 9652s with separate eproms for Mac/PC. The interface in each unit was a Nuendo 96/52 (actually made by RME and re-branded). These machines were used as demonstration and were carted around by sales people. We ran 4 Nuendo in-house testing DAWS which were (2) Dual IBM PIII Clones (800 Mhz.) and (2) Dual G4s (think 500s).
STEINBERG NUENDO 1.6 MAC
Unfortunately, for the Mac OS, I ran it with Genuine Nuendo hardware and it was still NOT ready for primetime. In my experience i have come to learn that there is no accidents.even if its not immediately apparent to you, there is no black magic voodoo, if something creates an error its 9 times out of ten, due to a real reason that hopefully can be rectified! only for alot of us, those reasons are hard to diagnose and harder to locate in the first place, either we dont have the experience required to observe, or the equipment even, to make those observations (ie: profesional diagnostic equipment) Its very logically possible that the instability reported by some, might be minimized using a real "nuendo" branded interface (or even a similar RME product from that timeline) Steinberg CHOSE RME hardware because of their rock solid dependability + performance! and probably built this entire application around the use of the RME hardware.
STEINBERG NUENDO 1.6 SOFTWARE
I think its very likely that using the actual "nuendo" branded hardware would have a positive impact on system stability + performance!! because even tho we have the freedom to use Steinberg Nuendo with other ASIO Capable hardware devices, nuendo was marketted as a package, and if it was sold to a company, i think they very much pushed the hardware + software as a package combination. it wouldnt be the first time that happened. Perhaps this "Buggyness" referred to by diehard + mactron is actually a result of 3rd party hardware not interfacing "as specified" by steinberg. Surely steinberg itself couldnt hide such a huge problem without releasijng sokme type of press release apology if its trueĪre there any users on the macos9lives site that has tried to use a "Real" Nuendo audio interface for more the a decade before attempting to create nuendo who are benefitting frm all tehir experience creating cubase itself.
STEINBERG NUENDO 1.6 CRACKED
Isnt it more plausable that u were both using the same failed copy of the software that was cracked in a way that produced some type of error that u both experienced?ĭiehard has made the comment that nuendo was in its infancy on os9 when compared to cubase.īut how can it be in its infancy when this program frm first release to final update was over a period of 2 years.Īnd its also not the first product of this type made by STEINBERG programmers. how could they make SUCH A DRASTIC error as this? surely they learned frm cubase and made everything better then before in nuendo. I mean it could be believable what u guys are proposign if they were a different company. How could they be so focused on developing a product that fails to save files properly? and literally stopped working on cubase for a good period of time. The evidence is clear that steinberg was focused on making nuendo. To me it logically doesnt make sense when u compare the development times/release dates I always ask him why he doesnt like cubase. digital performer+ nuendo are his tools 100% he usd to use cubase but has been a hardcore nuendo fanatic Saying that nuendo is better then cubase. I knew a guy who is a successfull producer and he swears by nuendo Or with the actual 100% legit version aswell. Now guys, are u suggesting that this is perhaps a problem with the specific 'warez' copy of it? I personally have never experienced any of this file saving problemsĬould it be possible that there is some problem that is not 'activated' for everyone? The 1.6 updates were released in july of 2002īoth diehard + mactron claim that nuendo itself is buggy as hell The 1.5 update was released july of 2001. Nuendo was originally released in april of 2000,